1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 422 So.2d
  5. 422 So.2d 867 (1982)
 

RAMPIL v. STATE

Nos. 81-365, 81-366, 81-408 to 81-414, 81-418, 81-606, 81-879, 81-1015 to 81-1022, 81-1229 and 81-1230.

422 So.2d 867 (1982)

Barton RAMPIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee, and Arthur SHERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee, and Edward GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee, and Salvatore COMPARATO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee, and Roger J. SUDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee, and Angelo L. ORTIZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee, and Margarita GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee, and Moises Raymond GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee, and Myrra CARRASCO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee, and Myrra CARRASCO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony S. Battaglia and Aubrey O. Dicus, Jr. of Battaglia, Ross, Hastings, Dicus & Campbell, St. Petersburg, for appellants Edward Gonzalez, Margarita Gonzalez, Moises Raymond Gonzalez and Myrra Carrasco.

Franklyn Louderback of Louderback & McCoun, St. Petersburg, for appellants Arthur Sherry and Barton Rampil.

No appearance for appellants Salvatore Comparato, Roger J. Suders and Angelo L. Ortiz.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and David T. Weisbrod, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

BOARDMAN, Acting Chief Judge.

We affirm the judgments and sentences on each and every count against each appellant, all of the issues raised by appellants being without merit.

Only one subissue merits discussion. Appellants challenge the validity of a wiretap on the telephone of three of appellants on several grounds, one of which is that the St. Petersburg police, who conducted the wiretap, were acting beyond their jurisdiction, since the tap was operated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases