HEIN v. BOARD OF PAROLE

CA A20972.

641 P.2d 642 (1982)

56 Or.App. 293

Charles A. HEIN, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 8, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. De Muniz, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Garrett, Seideman, Hemann, Robertson & De Muniz, P.C., Salem.

Scott McAlister, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARDEN and WARREN, JJ.


WARDEN, Judge.

Petitioner appeals an order setting his parole release date. He contends that the Board of Parole (Board) improperly added 52 months to his term of imprisonment before parole because of aggravating factors, thereby unlawfully delaying his release.

Petitioner was convicted of manslaughter and attempted murder in June, 1972. Petitioner's initial appearance before the Board was prior to the invocation of the matrix system, and petitioner received...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases