PARKHURST v. PARKHURST

No. 81-536.

413 So.2d 853 (1982)

Patricia H. PARKHURST, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Arthur B. PARKHURST, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 12, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Fox Miller of Miller & Schwartz, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Harry G. Carratt of Morgan, Carratt & O'Connor, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee/cross-appellant.


PER CURIAM.

We hold that the trial court's decision to adopt the master's recommendation and continue rehabilitative alimony at $250 per month for an additional forty months constitutes a permissible exercise of the court's discretion. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). Furthermore, the record contains sufficient facts to justify the court's discretionary decision not to make the award of alimony retroactive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases