TEEL v. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY

No. 80-02438; CA A23460.

649 P.2d 610 (1982)

58 Or.App. 564

In the matter of the Compensation of Robert W. TEEL, Claimant. Robert W. Teel, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 18, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Evohl F. Malagon, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Malagon & Velure, Eugene.

Katherine H. O'Neil, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With her on the briefs were Delbert J. Brenneman and Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

In this workers' compensation case, both claimant and employer appeal the order of the Workers' Compensation Board affirming the referee's decision that claimant's back injury is compensable. Claimant appeals the Board's failure to award a reasonable attorney fee, and employer cross-appeals on the issue of compensability. We affirm on compensability and remand to the Board for award of a reasonable attorney fee.

The procedural...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases