WOHLERS v. RUEGGER

No. 81-218; CA A23823.

649 P.2d 602 (1982)

58 Or.App. 537

Richard WOHLERS, Respondent, v. George RUEGGER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 18, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lynn F. Jarvis, Bend, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gray, Fancher, Holmes & Hurley, Bend.

Mike Ratliff, and Parks & Ratliff, Klamath Falls, filed the brief for respondent.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.


THORNTON, Judge.

Defendant appeals from an order granting plaintiff a new trial after the jury returned its verdict in favor of defendant. The trial court granted plaintiff's motion because of erroneously admitted evidence prejudicial to plaintiff. See ORCP 64(B)(6). We hold that, even if the evidence was erroneously admitted, it was not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant the granting of a new trial.

Plaintiff brought this action for damages to his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases