MARTIN-MARIETTA CORP. v. BENDIX CORP.

Nos. 82-1677, 82-1678.

690 F.2d 558 (1982)

MARTIN-MARIETTA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BENDIX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BENDIX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided September 22, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Elam, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, Ohio, Theodore Souris, Bodman, Longley & Dahling, Detroit, Mich., Robert B. Mazur, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York City, for United Technologies.

Russel H. Beatie, Jr., Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood, New York City, Leslie W. Fleming, Butzel Long Gust Klien & Van Zile, Detroit, Mich., for Martin-Marietta Corp.

James K. Robinson, Stephen Wasinger, Detroit, Mich., for Bendix Corp.

Joe D. Sutton, Lansing, Mich., for Michigan defendants-appellees.

Before ENGEL, KEITH and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges.


CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Appellants Martin-Marietta and United Technologies appeal a decision of the District Court refusing their request for a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the anti-fraud provisions of the Michigan Take-Over Offers Act, Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. §§ 451.901-917, and the Michigan Uniform Securities Act, Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. §§ 451.501-818, on the grounds that the issuance of an injunction is prohibited by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases