OPINION
CANTU, Justice.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of murder after a plea of not guilty; the punishment was assessed by the jury at seventy-five (75) years' confinement.
Appellant brings forth one ground of error on appeal. He complains that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of oral statements made by him to third parties, which evidence had been in the possession and knowledge of the district attorney prior
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.