PER CURIAM.
This appeal concerns the interpretation to be placed on the deposition testimony of Doctors Murphy and Huntington on the degree of physical impairment suffered by claimant. We note that the evidence in question was by deposition and that our vantage point in interpreting the deposition is not inferior to that of the deputy. See Phipps v. Sheffman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.