IN RE CONDUCT OF BELL

SC 28670.

655 P.2d 569 (1982)

294 Or. 202

In re Complaint As to the CONDUCT OF Neal H. BELL, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided December 15, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard W. Butler, Eugene, argued the cause for accused. With him on the brief was Atherly, Butler & Burgott, Eugene.

John W. Hitchcock, McMinnville, argued the cause and filed the brief for the Oregon State Bar.


PER CURIAM.

The issue is the appropriate sanction for a violation of DR 7-110(B), which forbids a lawyer to communicate as to the merits of a case with a judge before whom the case is pending except in circumstances not pertinent to the circumstances of this case.

The following statement of facts is drawn from the accused's brief insofar as that statement has been accepted by the Oregon State Bar in its brief. Facts not drawn from the accused's brief are those...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases