1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 653 P.2d
  5. 653 P.2d 551 (1982)
 

STATE v. RODINSKY

No. M066944; CA A22618.

653 P.2d 551 (1982)

294 Or. 12

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Phyllis Carol RODINSKY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 10, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen L. Fink, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on brief were James R. Appel, and Merten & Saltveit, P.C., Portland.

Richard David Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals her conviction for failure to obey a police officer, ORS 487.100, a Class C traffic infraction. Our review is de novo. ORS 46.340(4). She contends (1) that the initial stop of her vehicle was unlawful and that any subsequent order of the police officer was not a lawful order; (2) that ORS 487.100 is void for vagueness; (3) that the state failed to disclose exculpatory evidence; and (4) that the evidence was not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases