AUTOMATIC MERCHANDISERS, INC. v. WARD

No. 12736.

646 P.2d 553 (1982)

AUTOMATIC MERCHANDISERS, INC. Appellant, v. Lura WARD, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

June 15, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cromer, Barker, Michaelson, Gillock & Rawlings, and Victor Alan Perry, Kenneth Bick, Reno, for appellant.

Echeverria & Osborne, Reno, for respondent.


OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Automatic Merchandisers appeals from a judgment awarding respondent $75,000 in personal injury damages. Appellant raises several assignments of error, two of which we address. Appellant contends that the trial court erred: (1) by refusing to instruct the jury on respondent's obligation to mitigate her damages, and (2) by denying a motion to alter or amend judgment because the verdict was excessive. Each of the issues being without merit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases