STATE v. RHODES

No. 152A81.

287 S.E.2d 898 (1982)

STATE of North Carolina v. John RHODES.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by Daniel F. McLawhorn, Raleigh, for the State.

Malcolm R. Hunter, Jr., Asst. Appellate Defender, Raleigh, for the defendant-appellant.


PER CURIAM.

An adequate review of the evidence is contained in the opinion by the Court of Appeals. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in (1) failing to instruct the jury on the defendant's right to resist an arrest pursuant to an illegal entry into his home, (2) instructing the jury that the defendant's right to resist excessive force was conditioned on their finding that both Officer Hastings and Officer Workman used excessive force against the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases