MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE v. HITACHI CABLE, LTD.

No. A 81-347 Civ.

547 F.Supp. 633 (1982)

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, a Municipal Corporation, and Anchorage Telephone Utility, A Public Agency and Instrumentality of the Municipality of Anchorage, Plaintiffs, v. HITACHI CABLE, LTD., Hitachi Ltd. of Japan, Richard L. McBride, Forrest Ellis, Naoto Kudo, Hajime Noda, Takao Shiomi and Yoshitoki Kato, Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs, v. MARUBENI CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation, and Marubeni America Corporation, a New York corporation, Third Party Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Alaska.

September 16, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald G. Birch of Birch, Horton, Bittner, Monroe, Pestinger & Anderson, Anchorage, Alaska, for plaintiffs.

Paul L. Davis of Boyko & Davis, Anchorage, Alaska, William McD. Miller, A. Raymond Hamrick, III and Karl K. Ransom of Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

FITZGERALD, District Judge.

The Municipality of Anchorage and its telephone utility have made a claim in this action for damages arising out of Hitachi Cable, Ltd.'s bribery of two municipal employees, Richard McBride and Forrest Ellis.1 The Municipality seeks the remedies available for violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO),...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases