LUDOLPH v. BECHTEL ASSOCIATES PROF. CORP., D. C.

Civ. A. No. 81-0871.

542 F.Supp. 630 (1982)

Paul LUDOLPH, et ux., Plaintiffs, v. BECHTEL ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, D. C., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

June 11, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael H. Feldman, James M. Hanny, Ashcraft & Gerel, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Gary W. Brown, James W. Greene, Macleay, Lynch, Bernhard, Gregg & Attridge, Washington, D. C., for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of defendants, Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, D. C. and Bechtel Civil and Minerals, Inc. (collectively Bechtel), for summary judgment on the ground that, with respect to the matter at hand since Bechtel was (in its view) an agent of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), no action lies against Bechtel because a statute prohibits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases