WELTY v. McMAHON

No. 67127.

316 N.W.2d 836 (1982)

K. B. WELTY and Edward W. Dailey, Petitioners, v. Richard M. McMAHON, T. M. Whicher, and Hon. R. K. Richardson, Clerk of Supreme Court, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

March 2, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl H. Maahs, Spirit Lake, for petitioner Welty.

David A. Hirsch, Burlington, for petitioner Dailey.

Roger A. Lathrop and Craig A. Levien, Davenport, for respondent McMahon.

A. J. Stoik of Klass, Whicher & Mishne, Sioux City, for respondent Whicher.

Mark E. Schantz, State Sol. Gen., for respondent Richardson.

Considered en banc.


McGIVERIN, Justice.

We accepted original jurisdiction of this case under our supervisory power for review and declaratory judgment in order to determine the legality of the re-election of respondents Richard M. McMahon and T. M. Whicher to the State Judicial Nominating Commission, pursuant to chapter 46, The Code, and their subsequent certification of election by respondent R. K. Richardson, clerk of this court. We hold...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases