Appellant is a general painting contractor. The president of appellant testified that he would obtain contracts to do painting jobs and then retain the services of other painters to do the work for a specific sum. He also testified that appellant employed a foreman that supervised the painters, checking their work to make sure, for example, that if two coats of paint are required they are applied; that appellant fixed the time periods during which the jobs were to be completed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
