1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 285 S.E.2d
  5. 285 S.E.2d 822 (1982)
 

WALSTON v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES

No. 116.

285 S.E.2d 822 (1982)

Cullen WALSTON, Employee, Plaintiff, v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, Employer, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendant.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

As Corrected March 8, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hassell & Hudson by Robin E. Hudson, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee.

Teague, Campbell, Conely & Dennis by C. Woodrow Teague, Richard B. Conely and George W. Dennis III, Raleigh, Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter, by McNeill Smith and J. Donald Cowan, Jr., Greensboro, for defendants-appellants.

HUSKINS, Justice:

We said in Morrison v. Burlington Industries, 304 N.C. 1, 282 S.E.2d 458 (1981):

Except as to questions of jurisdiction, the rule is that the findings of fact made by the Commission are conclusive on appeal when supported by competent evidence. This is so even though there is evidence to support a contrary finding of fact. Morrison v. Burlington Industries, 301 N.C. 226

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases