GROGAN-BEALL v. FERDINAND ROTEN GALLERIES, INC.

Docket No. 50515.

133 Cal.App.3d 969 (1982)

184 Cal. Rptr. 411

CHARLENE GROGAN-BEALL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FERDINAND ROTEN GALLERIES, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

July 19, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Stark, Stewart & Simon, Stark, Stewart, Wells & Robinson, John F. Wells, Fonda Karelitz, Banker & Linderman and John F. Banker for Plaintiff and Appellant.

McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, William H. Armstrong and Jane E. Cosgriff for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

SCOTT, Acting P.J.

Plaintiff-appellant Charlene Grogan-Beall brought this action as a class action against Ferdinand Roten Galleries and MacMillan, Inc., for failure to comply with the disclosure-disclaimer provisions of the California Sale of Fine Prints Act (hereafter the Act). (Civ. Code, §§ 1740-1745.) After a jury trial, judgment was entered in plaintiff's favor; however, the court granted defendants' motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases