PER CURIAM:
The thrust of this appeal is the claim of the defendant that after having been convicted of three separate felonies committed during a reign of terror, the court should have ordered his three separate sentences to run concurrently instead of consecutively.
Defendant concedes that such matter is one for the exercise of sound discretion by the trial court, but contends that the court abused such discretion under the very legislation that invests...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.