COE v. U.S. DIST. COURT FOR DIST. OF COLORADO

No. 82-1309.

676 F.2d 411 (1982)

Dr. Charles COE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF COLORADO, Respondent, Michael Vitek, Henry Fieger, M.D., Jack Klapper, M.D., Stephen Kozloff, M.D., Robert Lederer, M.D., Nelson Mohler, D.O., Fredrick Paquette, M.D., Christine Petersen, M.D., Roy Piper, D.O., Bruce Wilson, M.D., and John Carroll, Attorney, in their official capacities as members of the Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners; The Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners, an agency of the State of Colorado; J. D. MacFarlane, in his official capacity as the Attorney General for the State of Colorado, R. Michael Mullens, in his official capacity as an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Colorado, and Ann Sayvetz, in her official capacity as an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Colorado, Real Parties in Interest.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 21, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rodney R. Patula of Pryor, Carney & Johnson, Englewood, Colo., for petitioner.

J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. Gen., and William A. Richardson, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of Colo., Denver, Colo., for real parties in interest.

Before BARRETT, McKAY and LOGAN, Circuit Judges.


BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

Dr. Charles Coe appears here as petitioner under a fictitious name, aggrieved with threatened professional disciplinary proceedings based upon complaints lodged against him with the Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners (Board). Dr. Coe filed a complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief with the District Court pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 to restrain the Board and the Colorado Attorney General from proceeding with a public hearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases