1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 89 A.D.2d
  5. 89 A.D.2d 991 (1982)
 

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK v. FRITZ

89 A.D.2d 991 (1982)

Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., Respondent-Appellant, v. Peter Fritz, Individually and as Agent for Warren Holding Co., et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) (And Three Other Actions.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

September 16, 1982

On the court's own motion, the decision and order (both dated September 7, 1982) in the above-captioned matter are amended nunc pro tunc so that the decretal paragraph reads as follows: Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by providing that there shall be a recomputation of the amount due Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to Trial Term...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases