PRAX v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

No. 81-1098.

322 N.W.2d 752 (1982)

Arnold PRAX, Respondent, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 13, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stringer, Courtney & Rohleder and A. James Dickinson, St. Paul, for appellant.

Peterson, Bell & Converse, Willard L. Converse and Pamela J. Converse, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


TODD, Justice.

This appeal arises out of an action brought by respondent Arnold Prax against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) to recover income loss benefits under the Minnesota No-Fault Act. Cross-motions for summary judgment were heard in the Washington County District Court, and on August 18, 1981, the trial court entered summary judgment for Prax, holding State Farm liable for income loss benefits which had been withheld since September...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases