ROSS v. ROSS


55 N.Y.2d 999 (1982)

Tamar Ross, Respondent-Appellant, v. Howard Ross et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 23, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel Sankel and Claudio B. Bergamasco for appellants-respondents.

Alexander Potruch, Kenneth Koopersmith and Michael K. Feigenbaum for respondent-appellant.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]): Plaintiff's cross appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the cross appeal pursuant to CPLR 5601 (subd [d]) does not lie because the cross appellant is not a party aggrieved by the prior nonfinal order of the Appellate Division (CPLR 5511). Defendants' appeal pursuant to CPLR 5601 (subd [a], par [ii]) dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases