IN RE ROSENTHAL


90 N.J. 12 (1982)

446 A.2d 1198

IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD L. ROSENTHAL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 25, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Johnson, Jr. argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board (Colette A. Coolbaugh, Secretary, attorney).

Richard L. Rosenthal argued the cause pro se.


PER CURIAM.

Two clients have brought separate complaints against respondent, Richard Rosenthal, in connection with his handling of their cases. As a result of their complaints, both the District X Ethics Committee and the District XI Ethics Committee brought presentments against him. These presentments concern either neglect of the client's case or failure to communicate with the client.

I

The Van Dunk Matter

The first complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases