The issue that is raised in this Small Claims Court proceeding on the court's own motion is as follows: Must a consumer who seeks relief under section 350-d of the General Business Law, a so-called "private Attorney General Statute" always bring an action for both damages and injunctive relief? If so, then a proceeding such as this one, under section 350-d of the General Business Law (as
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BESLITY v. HONDA
113 Misc.2d 888 (1982)
James M. Beslity, Claimant, v. Manhattan Honda, a Division of Dah Chong Hong Trading Corp., Defendant.
Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 6, 1982
May 6, 1982
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
James M. Beslity, claimant pro se. Manhattan Honda, defendant pro se.
Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
