McLEARN v. COWEN & CO.

No. 75 Civ. 1563 (CMM).

506 F.Supp. 489 (1981)

Mildred A. McLEARN, Plaintiff, v. COWEN & CO., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Barrett Siniwitz and Leonard Fuchs, Individually, Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

January 21, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Saxe, Bacon & Bolan, New York City, for plaintiff; Roy M. Cohn, John A. Kiser, New York City, of counsel.

Willkie, Farr & Gallagher, New York City, for defendant Cowen & Co.; Robert J. Kheel, New York City, of counsel.

Brown, Wood, Ivey, Mitchell & Petty, New York City, for defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated; Roger J. Hawke, New York City, of counsel.


METZNER, District Judge:

Plaintiff seeks an order amending an order dated January 12, 1976, to indicate that the dismissal of any common law claims alleged in the amended complaint was not on the merits. Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(a). That complaint had been dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 9(b), Fed.R.Civ.P.

The original complaint alleged that jurisdiction and venue in the action was predicated on Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases