PURTLE, Justice.
Appellant filed a suit against appellees to recover money paid on appellees' behalf while acting as surety for them on a construction contract. Appellant issued its policies without the signature of a valid agent as required by Ark.Stat.Ann. § 66-2221 (Repl.1980). Appellees' motion for summary judgment was granted on the grounds that contracts in violation of a statute are void even though not expressly declared so. The court further held that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
