1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 108 Misc.2d
  5. 108 Misc.2d 881 (1981)
 

VARGAS v. ROSAL-ARCILLAS

108 Misc.2d 881 (1981)

Kristian Vargas, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, Edgardo Vargas, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Zoe Rosal-Arcillas et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

May 13, 1981

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence M. Wilens for plaintiffs. Ferziger, Wohl, Finkelstein & Rothman (Ronald Gene Wohl of counsel), for Zoe Rosal-Arcillas, defendant. Bower & Gardner (Stephen S. York of counsel), for St. John's Queens Hospital, defendant.

ARTHUR W. LONSCHEIN, J.

This is an action stemming from the allegedly unauthorized circumcision of the infant plaintiff by the defendants. There are four causes of action, alleging (1) that the circumcision was done without consent of the infant's parents; (2) that the defendants negligently failed to adhere to standards of good and accepted medical practice in allowing the circumcision to be performed without the parents' consent; and (3) and (4) derivative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases