Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements.
Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint (see CPLR 3025, subd [b]). However, we note that "The showing necessary to uphold the discretion of a court in allowing an amended complaint is different from the showing necessary to withstand summary judgment or dismissal for no cause of action" (see Vastola v Maer,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.