1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 115 Cal.App.3d
  5. 115 Cal.App.3d 869 (1981)
 

CITY OF SACRAMENTO v. GEMSCH INVESTMENT CO.

Docket No. 18751.

115 Cal.App.3d 869 (1981)

171 Cal. Rptr. 764

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, Cross-complainant and Appellant, v. GEMSCH INVESTMENT COMPANY et al., Cross-defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

February 11, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Memering & DeMers, Henry W. Crowle and Claudia J. Robinson for Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Panattoni, Westley, Farrell & Callahan, David E. Davies, Miller, Good & Ford and Richard E. Good for Cross-defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

CECCHETTINI, J.*

The briefs of all parties show no significant factual dispute for the purposes of this appeal.

The appellant, City of Sacramento (City), appeals from judgments granting separate motions of respondents Gemsch Investment Company, Vandenberg Motors, and ABC Supply Inc., for summary judgment. The motions were coordinated and based on essentially the same grounds and facts....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases