1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 115 Cal.App.3d
  5. 115 Cal.App.3d 846 (1981)
 

GRANNEMAN v. MYERS

Docket No. 19196.

115 Cal.App.3d 846 (1981)

171 Cal. Rptr. 583

MAXINE GRANNEMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BEVERLEE A. MYERS, as Director, etc., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

February 9, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

George Deukmejian, Attorney General, Thomas E. Warriner, Assistant Attorney General, Charlton G. Holland and Janet G. Sherwood, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant.

Bruce Hagel and Catherine L. Hughes for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

PARAS, J.

The principal issue of this case is the validity of a Medi-Cal regulation prescribing the calculation to be used as a prerequisite to state aid in determining the share of cost of medical expenses to be paid by married Medi-Cal applicants in the "medically needy" category.1 We find the challenged regulation consistent with federal requirements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases