Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
The counterclaim in question asserts a cause of action to recover against an architect for breach of contract or for professional malpractice. Under either theory the board's claim accrued on the date of completion of the project which was the subject of the architectural contract between the parties and the consequent termination of their professional relationship thereunder (Sosnow v Paul
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.