1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 84 A.D.2d
  5. 84 A.D.2d 853 (1981)
 

MATTER OF BRIDGHAM v. TUTUNJIAN

84 A.D.2d 853 (1981)

In the Matter of Ruth T. Bridgham, Respondent, v. Henry Tutunjian et al., Constituting The Board of Elections of the County of Rensselaer, Appellants, and Gordon Evans, Intervenor-Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

November 2, 1981

In our view, the appeal taken by the respondent board of elections must be dismissed since it has not been established that such action by the board was duly authorized as required by law (Election Law, § 3-212, subd 2). The motion to dismiss this appeal, made by respondent Monahan, is therefore granted. The motion by Gordon Evans to intervene in the appeal taken by the board is dismissed, as academic. Finally, the appeal taken...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases