1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 122 Cal.App.3d
  5. 122 Cal.App.3d 813 (1981)
 

SUTTER SENSIBLE PLANNING v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Docket No. 19359.

122 Cal.App.3d 813 (1981)

176 Cal. Rptr. 342

SUTTER SENSIBLE PLANNING, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SUTTER COUNTY et al., Defendants and Appellants; SUTTER TOMATO PRODUCTS, INC., Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

August 20, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Reed, Samuel & Remy, James S. Reed, Michael H. Remy and Tina A. Thomas for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Darrell W. Larsen, County Counsel, Betty Wolfe, and Memering & DeMers for Defendants and Appellants.

Ellman, Passovoy & Burke Ellman and Howard N. Ellman for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

BLEASE, J.

Sutter Sensible Planning, Inc., and several affected individual property owners appeal from the denial of their petition for a writ of mandate seeking an order directing the Board of Supervisors of Sutter County to vacate its approval of an environmental impact report (EIR) and granting of a conditional use permit to construct a tomato paste processing plant on a parcel of land in the county. Plaintiffs also appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases