Claimant was employed by respondent employer as a psychiatrist. The issue before the board was whether her status as a consultant was that of employee or independent contractor within the meaning of the Workers' Compensation Law. The board found her not to be an employee and the sole issue on appeal is whether or not there is substantial evidence to support that determination. The record discloses, among other things, that claimant could control the number of hours which...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
