KIKKERT v. KIKKERT


88 N.J. 4 (1981)

438 A.2d 317

MARTIN KIKKERT, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ELIZABETH KIKKERT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 1, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ladislas F. Feher argued the cause for appellant.

Henry F. Ramer argued the cause for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 177 N.J.Super. 471 (1981).

PASHMAN, J., concurring.

In holding today that "vested" but unmatured private pensions are subject to equitable distribution, the Court reaffirms its commitment to a "comprehensive" application of equitable distribution principles to include "all

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases