Judgment affirmed, with costs.
The defense presented no evidence to contradict the testimony offered by plaintiff's expert physician and it was not demonstrated that plaintiff's former physician was within his control or was willing to provide testimony on plaintiff's behalf. It was thus proper for the Trial Justice to refuse defendants' request for a "missing witness" charge based on plaintiff's failure to call his former doctor to testify (see Noce v Kaufman...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
