1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 439 A.2d
  5. 439 A.2d 487 (1981)
 

HAIGHT v. D.C. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BD.

No. 80-271.

439 A.2d 487 (1981)

James F. HAIGHT, et al., Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided December 21, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Courts Oulahan, Washington, D.C., for petitioners.

Philip T. Van Zile, III, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom Judith W. Rogers, Corp. Counsel, and David P. Sutton, Acting Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent.

Before NEWMAN, Chief Judge, and HARRIS and FERREN, Associate Judges.

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

Petitioners, James Haight, Sam Kramm, and Earl Meyerson, all Georgetown business owners, seek review of a decision of the District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board granting the application of Matilda, Inc., t/a Cafe Matilda (Matilda's) for a Class "D" liquor license to serve beer and wine. See D.C.Code 1973, § 25-111(h). Petitioners contend that the Board erred in excluding certain evidence from the hearing, improperly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases