SHULMAN, Presiding Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction of the offense of distributing obscene materials. Finding no error warranting the grant of a new trial, we affirm.
1. Defendant argues cogently against the constitutionality of Code Ann. § 26-2101. However, since the Supreme Court, in Sewell v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
