1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 640 P.2d
  5. 640 P.2d 265 (1981)
 

CRESTVIEW, ETC. v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ETC.

No. 79CA0797.

640 P.2d 265 (1981)

CRESTVIEW WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT, Plaintiff-Appellee, City of Lakewood, acting by and through its Board of Water and Sewer Commissioners, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF and the METROPOLITAN DENVER SEWAGE DISPOSAL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., Defendants-Appellees, and City and County of Denver, William E. Smith, Joseph R. Albi, Nicholas Borelli, Jose Castello, Harold V. Cook, David L. Ereckson, C. Herbert Griffin, Theodore O. Hammond, Anthony H. Jansen, A. Dean Lund, Hazen E. Moore, Thomas I. Peabody, George C. Rupert, Joyce R. Salmon, Jerome Zohn and Andrew Armatas, individually and as members of the Board of Directors of Metropolitan Denver Sewage Disposal District No. 1, Intervenors-Appellants.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

December 31, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold Alperstein, Ronald C. Forman, Donald W. Alperstein, Denver, for plaintiff-appellee Crestview Water and Sanitation Dist. and Bernie Miller.

Inman & Flynn, P. C., John J. Flynn, Jr., Denver, for defendant-appellee Metropolitan Denver Sewage Disposal Dist. No. 1.

Calkins, Kramer, Grimshaw & Harring, Martha B. Taylor, Richard Harring, Denver, for defendants-appellees Bancroft-Clover Water and Sanitation Dist., East Lakewood Sanitation Dist., Fred E. Hendrickson and Randolph Aemmer.

Robinson & Scheurer, P. C., Richard J. Scheurer, Lakewood, for defendants-appellees Alameda Water and Sanitation District, Fruitdale Sanitation District, Boris Voukovitch and Richard Beckfeld.

Henry & Henry, James C. Henry, Lakewood, for defendants-appellees City of Lakewood and Hubert D. Henry.

Max P. Zall, City Atty., George J. Cerrone, Jr., John R. Palermo, Asst. City Attys., Denver, for intervenors-appellants.

STERNBERG, Judge.

The City and County of Denver, intervenor, appeals the judgment instructing the defendant Metropolitan Sewage Disposal District to reapportion itself. The principal issue is the interpretation of the terms "municipality" and "city" as used in § 32-4-509, C.R.S.1973, for purposes of determining representation of the board of directors of the district. We affirm.

The board consists of representatives of some, but not all, of the various...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases