The individual defendants are directors of the defendant corporation with Riklis being the president of the company and cochairman of the board of directors. The complaint, in mere conclusory fashion, seeks damages for alleged corporate waste. The dissent concedes that in a derivative action a "protective order should issue unless plaintiff presents `"factual allegations of evidentiary value to establish the charges of improper conduct"'" (Stepak v Alexander's, Inc.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LEWIS v. RIKLIS
82 A.D.2d 789 (1981)
Harry Lewis et al., Suing on Behalf of AITS, Inc., Appellants, v. Meshulam Riklis et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 30, 1981
June 30, 1981
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
