SHULMAN, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was convicted of possession of pethidine, possession of cocaine, and possession with intent to distribute marijuana. We affirm.
1. Defendant contends that because the contraband was found inside a house he occupied with another individual who had "equal access" to it, his conviction of the above offenses was improper. Defendant argues, citing Blankenship v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.