MURPHY v. BD. OF EXAM'RS


109 Misc.2d 735 (1981)

In the Matter of Francis G. Murphy et al., Petitioners, v. New York State Board of Law Examiners, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Albany County.

June 30, 1981


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis G. Murphy and Michael Feldman, petitioners pro se. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (C. Michael Reger of counsel), for respondent.


EDWARD S. CONWAY, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding in which petitioners seek a judgment setting aside a rule of the New York State Board of Law Examiners that requires applicants to the Bar exam in New York State to take both sections of the exam in New York State.

Both petitioners are domiciliaries of New York State and have completed their third year of law school in New York. They have applied and are qualified to take the New York State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases