At his plea, the appellant admitted that he had committed an act which, if done by an adult, would constitute the crime of burglary in the third degree. The respondent candidly conceded that the Judge at fact finding erroneously failed to explain to the appellant that he was waiving his constitutional rights to (i) trial, (ii) confrontation and (iii) cross-examination. Furthermore, the Judge did not explain the consequences flowing from such waiver (Matter of Steven W...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
