HAZEN v. COOK

No. 16-80-06719; CA 19800.

637 P.2d 195 (1981)

55 Or.App. 66

Herbert C. HAZEN and Robert M. Crowe, Appellants, v. Jack L. COOK, Respondent, and James N. Richmond, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 7, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terence J. Hammons, Eugene, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Hammons & Jensen, Eugene.

John C. Gartland, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Jarvill, Jarvill, & Gartland, Eugene.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and RICHARDSON and WARREN, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action on a promissory note executed by defendants Cook and Richmond to collect the full amount of principal, together with interest at 11 percent per annum, costs and attorney fees. Defendant Cook1 asserted an affirmative defense alleging the material elements of usury, including an allegation that plaintiffs had a "corrupt intent" to collect...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases