1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 638 P.2d
  5. 638 P.2d 186 (1981)
 

HOUT v. NANA COMMERCIAL CATERING, ETC.

No. 5224.

638 P.2d 186 (1981)

Paulette HOUT, Appellant, v. NANA COMMERCIAL CATERING, A DIVISION OF NANA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, and Brinkerhoff-Nabors, Joint Venture 36, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

December 31, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl L. Walter, Jr., Benkert & Walter, Anchorage, for appellant.

Phillip J. Eide, Ely, Guess & Rudd, Anchorage, for appellee NANA Development Corp.

Terrance A. Turner, Owens & Turner, Anchorage, for appellee Brinkerhoff-Nabors Joint Venture 36.

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and CONNOR, BURKE, MATTHEWS and COMPTON, JJ.

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

Paulette Hout brought suit against NANA Commercial Catering, Inc. [NANA] and Brinkerhoff-Nabors Joint Venture 36 [Brinkerhoff], alleging she was dismissed from her employment with NANA for discriminatory reasons. Hout alleged NANA dismissed her because of her sex, marital status,1 and national origin,2 in violation of AS 18.80.220(a)(1).3 She...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases