1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 529 F.Supp.
  5. 529 F.Supp. 269 (1981)
 

AWARD PETROLEUM, INC. v. VANTAGE PETROLEUM CORP.

Nos. 79 C 1467, 79 C 2079.

529 F.Supp. 269 (1981)

AWARD PETROLEUM, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. VANTAGE PETROLEUM CORP., et al., Defendants. BUSY BEE OIL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. VANTAGE PETROLEUM CORP., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. New York.

December 16, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nydick & Ross, Melville, N. Y., and Collier, Shannon, Rill & Scott, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff; Ira Nydick, Melville, N. Y., and Mark L. Austrian, John B. Williams and Lenore S. Ostrowsky, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Von Nostrand & Martin, Amityville, N. Y., and Dunaway, McCarthy & Dye, P. C., Washington, D. C., for defendant; William C. Morrell, Amityville, N. Y., and Mac S. Dunaway, Kenneth G. Hurwitz and Gary E. Cross, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Memorandum of Decision and Order

MISHLER, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendant Iorizzo moves for summary judgment, or in the alternative, Iorizzo seeks an order dismissing the Amended Complaint filed by Busy Bee Oil Company ("Busy Bee"), 79 C 2079, and the Second Amended Complaint filed by Award Petroleum, Inc. ("Award"), 79 C 1467. Plaintiffs cross-move under Rule 56(f) to defer consideration pending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases