ZOUTENDYK v. STATE PATROL

No. 47410-9.

95 Wn.2d 693 (1981)

628 P.2d 1308

LEONARD J. ZOUTENDYK, Respondent, v. WASHINGTON STATE PATROL, Appellant, WASHINGTON STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, Petitioner. LEONARD J. ZOUTENDYK, Respondent, v. WASHINGTON STATE PATROL, Appellant. RUTH PALMER, ET AL, Respondents, v. WASHINGTON STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

June 4, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Richard A. Heath, Assistant, for petitioner.

Clifford F. Cordes III (of Cordes, Cordes & Younglove), for respondents.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Thomas F. Carr, Assistant, amici curiae for petitioner.


DIMMICK, J.

At issue is whether a state employee who seeks court review of an adverse decision by the Washington State Personnel Board (Board) is required to pay the costs of a transcript, either as a prerequisite to court review or as a taxable cost if he/she does not prevail on appeal. The consolidated cases of nine employees have been accepted by our court solely for the determination of that common issue.

In each case some disciplinary action was taken...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases