1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 273 S.E.2d
  5. 273 S.E.2d 513 (1981)
 

JOHNSTON v. GILLEY

No. 8026SC531.

273 S.E.2d 513 (1981)

D. R. JOHNSTON v. James R. GILLEY and Smith W. Bagley.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

January 6, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Caudle, Underwood & Kinsey, P.A., by Lloyd C. Caudle and John H. Northey, III, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee.

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard by Hubert Humphrey, Jr., and Reid L. Phillips, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant.

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant Bagley argues that the trial court erred (1) in concluding that G.S. 1-75.4(5)1 authorized the trial court to exercise in personam jurisdiction over him; and (2) that the trial court erred in concluding that the court's exercise of in personam jurisdiction over him did not violate due process of law. Defendant's argument follows the two-step analysis suggested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases