1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 105 Wis.2d
  5. 105 Wis.2d 670 (1981)
 

CITY OF NEW BERLIN v. WERTZ

No. 81-578.

105 Wis.2d 670 (1981)

314 N.W.2d 911

CITY OF NEW BERLIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Alfred L. WERTZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided December 22, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of Stephen J. Hajduch of Milwaukee.

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of Daniel Kile of Schober & Radtke of New Berlin.

By order of the court a brief was submitted by Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Kirbie Knutson, assistant attorney general.

Before Voss, P.J., Brown and Scott, JJ.

SCOTT, J.

The issue in this case is whether the prosecutor was required to prove compliance with certain administrative code procedures as foundation for the introduction into evidence of the results of a breathalyzer test. The trial court held that compliance with all administrative code procedures was not required for test results to be admitted, and we affirm.

This case came to this court as a one-judge appeal from a conviction for violation of an ordinance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases